Nutrition Comparison
Today's Deals
All categories Beauty & Longevity 0 comparisons Gut & Digestion 0 comparisons Herbs & Botanicals 0 comparisons Omega & Healthy Fats 5 comparisons Protein & Fitness 0 comparisons Sleep, Stress & Brain 0 comparisons Vitamins & Minerals 0 comparisons
Beauty & Longevity Beauty and longevity supplements, including collagen, biotin, CoQ10, NMN, and resveratrol. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

Gut & Digestion Digestive health supplements, including probiotics, prebiotics, fiber, digestive enzymes, and psyllium husk. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

Herbs & Botanicals Herbal and botanical extracts, including ashwagandha, turmeric/curcumin, ginseng, garlic, milk thistle, and berberine. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

Omega & Healthy Fats Omega-3 and essential fatty acid supplements, including fish, krill, algal, and plant-based oils. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

Protein & Fitness Protein powders and workout supplements, including whey, casein, plant protein, creatine, BCAA/EAA, pre-workout, beta-alanine, and electrolytes. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

Sleep, Stress & Brain Sleep, stress, and cognitive support supplements, including melatonin, magnesium glycinate, L-theanine, nootropics, and adaptogens. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

Vitamins & Minerals Single-nutrient and multivitamin supplements, including vitamin A through K, magnesium, zinc, iron, calcium, and selenium. View hub ›

More comparisons in this category are coming soon.

We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
HomeHow We Test
Methodology

How We Test

Search any supplement and you get thousands of bottles, a dozen "best" lists that rank whatever pays most, and labels written to look stronger than they are. Two products with the same headline number on the front can differ threefold in what your body actually absorbs.

We do not own a laboratory and we do not pretend to. Our comparisons are built from labels, certificates of analysis, and published research, then reviewed by a second team member. This page sets out exactly what that involves and where it stops.

6 Stage process 32+ Products assessed 5 Score inputs

Who Is Behind These Reviews

Nutrition Comparison is a small team, not a content farm. Two people write and one reviews, and every guide names all three at the top so you can check our reasoning against our qualifications.

TM
Theresa Monroe Senior Health & Wellness Editor Full bio ›

Theresa Monroe is a Seattle-based wellness coach and health editor. Armed with a degree in Public Health from Portland State University and a Certified Nutrition Coach credential, she spent over a decade helping families navigate complex supplement labels. She focuses on translating dense nutritional research into practical, honest reviews for everyday health.

SB
Silas Bancroft Independent Supplement Researcher Full bio ›

Silas Bancroft is a nutrition researcher based in Boston, Massachusetts, specializing in dietary supplements for healthy aging. Holding a B.S. in Biology from the University of Massachusetts Boston, he evaluates clinical studies behind longevity vitamins, joint support formulas, and cognitive supplements. Silas provides clear, evidence-based supplement reviews to help seniors make informed wellness choices.

ZM
Zayden Maddox Fitness Coach & Product Reviewer Full bio ›

Zayden Maddox is a Denver-based sports nutrition coach specializing in workout supplements. With a B.S. in Kinesiology from Colorado Mesa University and a Certified Personal Trainer credential, he analyzes active ingredients in protein powders, pre-workout formulas, and muscle recovery vitamins. Zayden tests sports supplements to provide honest product reviews for active individuals.

What We Judge a Supplement On

Before any scoring happens, a product has to clear five questions. These are the questions we would ask about a bottle in our own cupboard, and they are the same for every category.

01

Active dose you actually get

The number that matters is the active compound per serving, not the total weight of the capsule. We normalize every product to the same unit before comparing.

02

Molecular form and absorption

Two products with identical doses absorb differently. Triglyceride versus ethyl ester, citrate versus oxide, and similar distinctions change what reaches your bloodstream.

03

Third-party testing

Whether an independent body verified the label. USP, NSF, IFOS, and Informed Sport all mean something specific, and we say which one applies rather than writing "tested".

04

Manufacturer track record

Recall history, FDA warning letters, GMP facility status, and whether the brand publishes certificates of analysis by lot or only on request.

05

Evidence behind the claim

Whether published research supports the dose on the label for the use the brand markets it for, and how strong that literature actually is.

06

Cost per unit of active

Bottle price tells you little. We calculate cost per gram of active compound and cost per day at the label serving, which reorders most categories.

The Six-Stage Process

Every guide runs the same sequence. It is deliberately mechanical: two editors working the same category from the same sources should reach a similar shortlist, because preference enters as late as possible.

1

Sweep the category

We list every product currently available in the category, not only the well-marketed ones, and record price, serving size, and stated actives from the live listing.

Full sweep Live listings Price recorded
2

Read the Supplement Facts panel

Actives come from the panel, never from the front of the bottle. Anything without a readable panel or a published ingredient breakdown is cut at this stage.

Panel over packaging Proprietary blends flagged
3

Normalize the numbers

Everything converts to active nutrient per serving, per dollar, and per day. This is the step that stops a large serving size from making a weak product look strong.

Per serving Per dollar Per day
4

Verify third-party testing

USP, NSF, and IFOS results are pulled per lot where a brand publishes them. Where certification is claimed but not evidenced, we record that as unverified rather than as tested.

USP NSF IFOS Per-lot COA
5

Score and rank

The NC Score applies the same five weights across every product in the category. Ties break on cost per gram of active nutrient, never on brand recognition.

Consistent weights Within-category
6

Second review, then re-check

A second team member checks dose, upper limits, and interactions against published literature before publication. Prices, labels, and certificates are revisited on each scheduled update.

Peer review Scheduled updates

What Goes Into an NC Score

The NC Score is an editorial rating out of 10 that weights five inputs. It compares products against each other inside one category. It is not a clinical prediction, and a 9.8 does not mean a product will work for you.

Active nutrient dose 30%

Milligrams of the compound that matters per stated serving, and whether reaching a research-relevant dose takes one capsule or six.

Form & bioavailability 25%

Molecular form, salt, or delivery system, and what absorption evidence exists for it rather than for the compound in general.

Third-party verification 20%

Independent testing for identity, purity, contaminants, and oxidation, weighted toward programs that publish per-lot results.

Cost per gram of active 15%

Price divided by total active nutrient in the container, which regularly reorders a category once serving sizes stop hiding it.

Label transparency 10%

Full ingredient disclosure, no proprietary blends masking doses, clear allergen and excipient information.

Reading the scale
9.7 9.7–10 Excellent. Our strongest picks in the category. 9.3 9.3–9.6 Very good. Very close to the best, with minor trade-offs. 8.5 8.5–9.2 Good. A solid performer with a clearly named trade-off. 8.0 8.0–8.4 Fair. Still effective, but a real limitation kept it out of the top tier.

Products that fall short of 8.0 do not make it into a published guide.

How We Decide Best Overall, Best Value and Best For

A ranked list is only useful if the labels mean something. Most roundups hand out "Best Value" to whatever is cheapest on the page. Ours are defined rules, applied after scoring, and only one product can hold each.

Best Overall Highest NC Score with no disqualifying trade-off It must clear a research-relevant dose, carry third-party verification, and sit within reasonable reach of the category's median price. A top score that fails any of the three does not take this label.
Best Value Lowest cost per gram of active among verified products Not the cheapest bottle. A product only qualifies if it also carries third-party testing, which rules out most of the budget shelf.
Best for [use case] Strongest fit for one specific reader Awarded for a concrete need: a liquid for people who cannot swallow capsules, a certified-for-sport option for tested athletes, an enteric coating for anyone who gets reflux.
No label Most products get none A product can rank well and carry no label at all. We do not invent a superlative for every entry on the list.

A product can win a label without topping the list, and the highest NC Score is not automatically Best Overall. If the top scorer costs four times the runner-up for a marginal gain in dose, the label goes to the runner-up and we say why.

How We Verify Our Picks

Before every publication

No guide publishes with only one person's name on it. The review is not a rubber stamp on the rankings, which stay editorial. It is a check on the four things that can cause real harm if we get them wrong.

Dose accuracy Does the recommended amount match what the literature actually uses?
Upper limits Is any suggested intake near a tolerable upper intake level?
Drug interactions Anticoagulants, thyroid medication, and anything with a narrow therapeutic window.
Population cautions Pregnancy, nursing, children, and renal or hepatic impairment.

Sources We Rely On

Supplement Facts panels

The primary source for every number we publish, captured from the current label rather than an archived image.

Certificates of analysis

Per-lot results from USP, NSF, and IFOS programs where the brand publishes them, flagged where it does not.

Peer-reviewed literature

NIH Office of Dietary Supplements reviews, EFSA opinions, and primary trials for dose and safety context.

Live retail listings

Price, unit count, and bundle contents recorded at time of writing and re-checked on every update.

Where Our Method Stops

Stated limitations

A comparison built from documents can only tell you what the documents say. These are the gaps, and we would rather name them than let a confident tone imply we filled them.

  • We do not assay products ourselves, so we cannot confirm that a capsule contains what its label claims unless an independent program has tested it.
  • Third-party certification proves purity and identity, not efficacy. A tested product can still be a poor fit for your situation.
  • Evidence quality varies enormously by compound. Omega-3 has decades of trials; several longevity compounds have almost no human data, and our guides say so.
  • Formulas change without a name change. A figure that was accurate at publication can be wrong two months later, which is why the update date matters.
  • An NC Score compares products inside one category at one point in time. It is not a prediction about your body, your diet, or your medication list.

How We Keep Reviews Current

Supplement formulas change without a name change, and prices move daily. Every guide carries a published date and a last-updated date, and substantial changes are noted at the top of the article rather than made quietly.

Price & availability Monthly Every figure re-checked against the live retail listing.
Full re-review Quarterly Category re-swept, new products assessed, scores recalculated.
Corrections On report Verified errors fixed in place and noted at the top of the guide.

Independence & How We Make Money

Affiliate disclosure

Nutrition Comparison is funded by affiliate commissions. When you buy through a link here we may earn a commission from the retailer, at no extra cost to you. That is the whole business model, and it comes with rules we hold ourselves to.

  • No brand pays for inclusion, a position, an NC Score, or the removal of a criticism. There is no rate card because nothing is for sale.
  • We buy no sponsored reviews and accept no free product in exchange for coverage.
  • Commission rates are not a scoring input. Where two products score equally, the tie breaks on cost per gram of active, not on payout.
  • No manufacturer sees a guide, a score, or a ranking before it publishes.

Several products we rate highly have no affiliate program at all. They stay in the guides, unlinked.

Limitations & Medical Disclaimer

Nothing on this site is medical advice, and our comparisons are not a diagnosis, prescription, or treatment plan.

Supplements interact with medication, and safe intakes differ by age, pregnancy status, kidney and liver function, and existing conditions. Talk to a doctor or a registered dietitian before starting anything new, especially if you take blood thinners, are pregnant or breastfeeding, or are managing a chronic condition. Statements here have not been evaluated by the FDA.

Our reviews describe what a label contains and what published research says about that ingredient. They cannot tell you what your body needs, and a high NC Score is a judgement about a product, never a recommendation for a person.

Method FAQs

Do you test the supplements in a laboratory?+

No. We compare labels, certificates of analysis from independent programs, and published research. Where a claim requires an assay to confirm, we cite whose assay it was rather than implying it was ours.

Can a brand pay to be included or ranked higher?+

No. We do not accept sponsored reviews, paid inclusion, or free product in exchange for coverage, and no brand sees a guide before publication. Affiliate commissions are paid by the retailer and do not vary by product.

Why do most published scores sit in the Good-to-Excellent range?+

Products that fail label transparency or verification checks do not reach scoring at all, and anything under 8.0 does not make it into a published guide. What survives that filter tends to cluster in the higher bands, but a Fair-tier product can still appear when it works well despite one clearly named trade-off, such as a higher cost per gram or a less bioavailable form.

How is the medical review different from fact checking?+

Fact checking confirms that a number matches its source. The medical review asks whether a dose is appropriate, whether it approaches an upper limit, and whether it interacts with common medications. Both happen, and they are separate steps.